When Lions Roared

Some help here guys? Now fully engaged, as he would be for the remainder of the war, Stalin did what he knew best. He spent people. Having a near endless supply of farm-boys, factory workers, miners, trappers, and other unskilled civilians from his vast empire, he undertook a simple but ruthless strategy; he would out-man the Germans. The military was required to slow the enemy, yield, and then counterattack. Hold. Attack. Yield. Counterattack. In the meantime, farms were burned, supplies moved ever backwards, as the season advanced. This strategy was one few nations could afford because it required millions of expendable people and vast tracts of land. Both would have to be sacrificed in enormous quantities because that was the only way to fight an enemy possessed of superior weaponry, better training, fighting experience, and hell-bent on moving forward. If we can presume Stalin had few qualms with the costs of the campaign, what exactly would he then worry about? There

Hitler failed because he repeated Napoleon's mistake. Yes, and no... Why Napoleon failed in Russia: He invaded Russia. He invaded Russia in June, perilously close to the brutal winter season. He presumed rapid advances and victories would cause the enemy to seek peace. His supply train was hampered by disease, starvation, deserters behind his lines, weather, and finding nothing but devastated land all around due to Russia's scorched earth policy. He reached Moscow in September and took it without a fight. Since the Russians had evacuated Moscow and removed all the supplies they could take with them, French troops found nothing to take as spoils. With winter upon them, they took to burning anything they could find and were likely responsible for a fire that destroyed most of the city, housing that the French needed for shelter. With no shelter, and no supplies, Napoleon ordered a retreat in October, during which the Russian army herded him down the same roads he had t